Home Inspection

The objection to automated messaging is almost never technical. It is that the owner has read the default templates and correctly concluded they sound like a bank.
That instinct is right, and it is worth protecting. An inspection is a high-anxiety purchase attached to the largest transaction most people ever make. A message that reads as machinery makes it worse. But the answer is to rewrite the messages, not to send them by hand or not at all.
A complete sequence runs from booking to review and has six sends. Each has one job.
Three rules carry most of the weight.
No we unless there genuinely is a we. No your inspection professional. The client booked a named human and should hear from one. First person throughout.
The client wants the time window and the access arrangements. Put those in the first two lines. Pleasantries after the information, not before it.
A specific note about parking, about the dog, about the crawlspace hatch. Merge fields cannot fake it, and one such line makes the rest of the message read as written rather than assembled.
The test is simple: read the message aloud. If you would not say it in that order to someone standing in front of you, it needs another pass.
Turn on the day-before reminder first, on its own, and leave it for two weeks. It is the message with the clearest effect on the working day and the least tone risk. Once you trust that one, the rest follow easily, because the argument is no longer about whether automation is impersonal — it is about which six messages you want to write once.
Every message above is configuration inside a license the business already holds. None of it requires an upgrade.
Start Here
Eight categories, scored against your three closest competitors. We need nothing from you but your business name — every signal we check is already public.
Get Your Score